Saturday, June 1, 2013

Eun Hye Jang / reaction

 201104213 Eun Hye Jang

 

 There is a saying, "There is much more than meets the eye." Especially, when we see a photograph, we are likely to miss some things since we tend to interpret it without thinking. Here are two photographs which deal with the same subjects, children. On the outside, we may notice only the difference of mood between the two photographs. However, we may find something more as long as we pay more attention to them.

   In a photograph called "Village School" taken by Margaret Bourke-White, we see children sitting on wooden benches set in rows in a classroom. It seems that the children are controlled by someone who does not appear in the photograph because most of the children display straight faces as if they are oppressed. Some wear crew-cuts and the others wear relatively long hairs. Some stare at the camera and the others look elsewhere. Some are sitting alone and the others are sitting with their friend. The main center of interest is a boy smiling faintly gazing at the camera. In the foreground, behind him, a boy grimaces looking at the camera. Two of the children put on bright color clothes while the others wear dark color clothes. However, all of them wear somewhat formal clothes regardless of colors. The classroom is pretty dark. There are only boys in the classroom. The classroom is somber and the atmosphere seems to be stiff.

   In the photograph called "Children's Puppet Theatre, Paris 1963 taken by Alfred Disenstadt, we see children standing irregularly. There are both girls and boys. This photograph is taken outdoors. It is daytime and so it is bright. In periphery we can see trees. Though we can see only five faces of the children perfectly in the foreground, there are a lot of people in the background. These five children wear different styles of clothes and unique facial expressions. Truly they show completely different reactions. Some cry out and others are surprised. One stops ears with hands. The main center of interest is a boy leaning out of other children pointing somewhere.

   In the Brouke-White photograph, we may think that it is restricted. However, if we take a closer look, things are different. An invisible controller may try to control children to impress viewers with perfect order. However, judging from such things not totally coordinated as different hair styles, clothes, and facial expressions, the children may enjoy freedom to some degree. Things may not be as strict as they appear. In the Eisenstadt photograph, we can see genuine feelings in the facial expression of children. This photograph vividly conveys the sense of realism. The children seem to enjoy total freedom.

  Provided that we peer eagerly into these two photographs, we may find that they have a kind of freedom in common. Children in both photographs may be free. The only difference is whether the freedom is revealed ostensibly or it is manipulated to be concealed. Rather, the former seemingly staged photograph may make us more smile when we have a close reflection on it. So next time when watching a serious photograph, try to find hidden things.

 

2 comments:

  1. To EunHye Jang From Minyoung Kang

    
1. What I like about this piece of writing is how you started out the essay with a quote. However, I also think that it will be better if you connected the meaning of quote with the essay with more details.

    
2. Your main point seems that the two pictures are very different if we pay more attention to them.

    
3. These particular words or lines struck me as powerful:
    1) wooden benches ~: I like how you described the features of the photo first. This is definitely something I can learn from because I just thought that the readers will already know how the photo will look like, but it may not always be true. It is great that you described what is going on in the photograph first.

    4. Some things aren't clear to me.
    1) standing irregularly: I am not sure if this expression is used correctly. If you stand irregularly, it just feels that you are standing abnormally to me. I might be wrong, but you can use other expressions like they are standing randomly?

    
5. The one change you could make that would make the biggest improvement in this piece of writing is that it would be better if you added brief descriptions about the photos you will discuss in the intro paragraph, so the readers know what to expect in the body paragraphs.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 
1. What I like about this piece of writing is how you illustrated two photographs in details.

    
2. Your main point seems there are some noticeable differences of mood between two photographs, but there are something more when we pay more attention to them.

    
3. These particular words or lines struck me as powerful:

    An invisible controller may try to control children to impress viewers with perfect order.

    : I liked the word "an invisible controller." ;)

    4. Some things aren't clear to me.

    Everything was clear except one thing that the other person already made a comment on. "Standing irregularly" sounds odd to me.

    
5. The one change you could make that would make the biggest improvement in this piece of writing
    : It would be better if you compared and contrasted two photographs in more details. I liked your new perspective, but I thought writing a reaction essay on two photographs was about comparing and contrasting them????

    ReplyDelete